The company actually have more signals for an abuse case, as there is not wrong if a user wants to complete waggering requirement to claim the bonus in a given program by the company.
They have user data, activities that can be used together with other metrics in their access, to analyze potential abuse cases from users, and they will only make a conclusion of abuse if there are enough solid proofs of suspicious abuse activities.
Right. Since they have your information and they know how you usually play, but you suddenly do not match your previous pattern, then the casino may suspect you. From the point of view of a player, you may say it is not wrong to complete the wager and withdraw the funds, which I agree. But if you see this from the casino's perspective, that player is not good for their business.
The player was invited because they were VIPs on other platforms, and the casino offered him a bonus to be a regular player on their platform. Not to withdraw the funds just after the deposit. I do not want to blame Razed for that. It seems like the community members agree with that point.