[...]
Edit:
Holydarkness : You gave an example of a "burned paper," but that analogy doesn't even match the situation. Duckdice has repeatedly changed its story.
But if you take a look at the screenshot :
https://imgur.com/a/ivzSNe8 , it clearly contradicts your current comment. In that screenshot, the Duckdice.io representative stated that they received a response from
their team confirming that my account was deleted upon my request. Earlier, you mentioned that there is no data showing my request for account deletion. So, how is it possible that the Duckdice representative claimed they received a response from their team confirming that my account was deleted upon my request? This seems contradictory.
To the point, If Duckdice.io truly deleted everything, there wouldn’t be any data to check.
I think I've mentioned it on a very earlier discussion we had. Something like kirito can't find your username on their database, thus inquiring you for a proof that you indeed had an account [that request of email showing username] and upon provided, he gave it to the team who handled database and they told him "if the player had an account and now no longer exist in database and can't be found, then they've must be asking for account deletion" or something like that. That's the imaginary scenario I had in mind, of course.
Alternatively, I probably stand corrected. there was an entry, a simple entry that they need to keep in order to be compliant to certain regulation, yet still stick with GDPR's data protection, something like a short line "sezmisenk41 - account removal requested" that's inaccessible by a simple search from whicever division kirito is working and only accessible to the division who confirmed to him. Once he inquired that the username was indeed a DuckDice player at a point [with your screenshot as proof], the department look into their database and pull that restricted record.
I personally lean toward the ealier narrative than the latter, it seems more logical.
If you insist though, as I mentioned before, the only way to get out of this paradox and make sense of it is to provide a logic out of those illogical things. So, if you don't mind, perhaps you can help us understand by explaining why do you think [according to your logic] they lied about account removal and database erasure while the very existence of the database actually works in their favor?
Why do I think they lied about account removal and database erasure? Simply because their inconsistent statements suggest it. Initially, they said my account didn’t exist. Once I provided evidence proving it did, they claimed it was erased due to GDPR compliance. However, they continue to make assertions about what happened with my account and bets, which would require data they supposedly don't want to share.
Also I am sure they are lyng as, If the full data were to come out showing which bets were wins and which were losses, it would clearly reveal the actual results of my bets and might expose yet another instance of unfairness. As of now, you can't definitively say there were 48 losses or 57 losses in a row because the outcome of each bet is not visible. Without knowing the outcome-whether a bet was a win or a loss. Th lack of transparency makes it impossible to trust their narrative and only adds to the suspicion.
That could just as easily be 20 wins or 30 wins in a row, as we still don’t know the actual outcome of those bets. Without seeing the results clearly, it’s impossible to make an accurate judgment. The lack of transparency only fuels the doubt that something might be hidden.
If the existence of the database worked in their favor, as you suggest, then why not use it transparently to refute my claims once and for all? Instead, they rely on vague statements, contradictions, and the assumption that I asked for deletion without providing concrete proof. This behavior only fuels doubts about their integrity.
It will always be a doubt in my mind_no, not just a doubt; I am sure that I have been scammed by Duckdice. I’ve seen with my own eyes their ability to change bet results from a win to a loss. The proof of this exists, yet it seems like Holydarkness and other users either don’t want to read it or perhaps just can’t see it.
What’s even more concerning is that
Duckdice.io’s own admin accepted that a bet result was manipulated. They apologized to the user, refunded the manipulated bet, and even called the user a VIP afterward. This clearly shows that they are capable of such actions. Once this has been admitted and proven, how can anyone deny the possibility that it’s happening to others as well, including me?
Imagine if I had even a single win during that alleged 158 losing streak - just one win- I would have reset my betting amount instead of continuing to bet in the hope of recovering my losses.
What if they manipulated my bets?. The way they keep hiding things, changing their statements, and avoding direct answers increases my doubts more and more. Instead of being transparent, their actions make me question the fairness of the entire system even further.