Post
Topic
Board Reputation
Re: New way for sig campaigns
by
GeorgeJohn
on 31/12/2024, 09:30:10 UTC
  • Merit earned
from the initial participants of signature campaign is been paid base rank hierarchy, and that method has be nice to the forum since signature campaign started, so paying participants base total numbers of merit earned in the forum will bring corruption and it will make trading of merit to increase....so from my perspective I think that payment should be base on the rank, and if they will be addition of payment to higher earned merit that supposed to be when a rank that is higher than Legendary is been introduced by theymos.

  • Quality of posts
when you check very well you note that many people make a quality post, and if you started making payment base on quality post, a member rank or full member rank user who makes a quality post can earn more than a Legendary rank user who earned more than one thousand merit [1000].... so I think is better to change or reshuffle your campaign participant's you notice that people who is promoting your signature is not making a positive impact to the company you promote...because the good poster is higher than shitposters.

Secondly, what makes quality of people to reduce is much alt, so if I'm a campaign manager, I will figure out some people alt and if I notice that you have more than two accts you will not be selected in my campaign.

  • Length of posts on average
  • Trust
  For me length of post and trust, you have on your profile doesn't indicate a good poster, you can make a two line stanza and is very comprehensive, I think is better than lengthy post...You and I know quite well that can be given to particular user due to a genuine transaction you did with people.[/list]