I totally disagree with that, it's your personal experience, you waste time if you limit yourself to using what is already written without trying to go further, but the exploration of scientific topics that seem impossible have always been solved sooner or later, sometimes even without wanting to find it!.
An example:
Heinrich Hertz, never saw the practical use of radio waves. Decades later wireless communication signals were invented,
we should never give up on something, theorems have been solved even centuries later.
Just because you can't doesn't mean that nobody else will ever do it!
I’ve shared many things here, but as you, Nomachines, or others might think, some of them might seem like ‘cute’ or futile attempts.
However, that doesn’t mean this thread captures the full depth of my efforts or experiments—there are still many scientific tricks and insights I haven’t shared yet.
Anyway, my post is specifically aimed at newbies—those who often enter these challenges with minimal effort and high expectations, hoping for quick success.
Even many of them don’t even take the time to read older posts, study the groundwork, or fully grasp the complexity of these puzzles.
This isn’t about discouraging genuine curiosity or scientific exploration—it’s about setting realistic expectations for those who might be diving in without the preparation or perseverance needed to even begin unraveling such a relentless riddle.