Post
Topic
Board Scam Accusations
Re: 🚨Exposing Stake Originals: "PROVABLY FAIR" Statistical Evidence of Manipulation
by
BlackyJacky
on 31/12/2024, 13:47:58 UTC
AHOYBRAUSE still did not explain why he quoted the percentages of winning and losing a Black Jack hand, but he meanwhile informed us that he is severe insane!

He hallucinates things and then publicly false and misleading declares his hallucinations as facts!

I make it easy for you. You basically said it several times in all your posts that it's the same. You say you should have lost 900 out of 180000 bets, because of the advertised 0.5% house edge. This means you think chance of winning and house edge is the same.  Roll Eyes And you still want to deny it?

When the house edge is 0,5%, then logically the chance of winning 99,5%.

This is what I think and I never, ever said that I think house edge and chance of winning is the same!
 
Quote
If we reduce the number of wins from the number of losses, we can see that I lost 8,327 bets (86,612 minus 78,285 = 8,327)

Losing 8,327 bets out of 180,904 bets placed = 4,6% of the bets lost.

0,5% house edge out of 180,900 bets placed I should lose 900 bets + a possible small deviation.

As everyone can see, not one word where I say house edge and chance of winning is the same!

This is what your brain has hallucinated!  Cheesy


My question is still not answered, so let me try again:

What is your message of saying that the chance of losing a hand is 49% and the chance of winning a hand is 42%?

The chance of winning is 99.5%?? Nice! Guess I will play BJ and get rich then.

How can you get rich when you statistically lose 0,5% of each bet?

How insane are you?

Why does whale.io engage insane people to represent its brand?