What does all this mean? Well I plan on rank not being a deciding factor in how much a user makes. I want to introduce a tier system. In this tier system, your rank means absolutely nothing. You can be a full member and make what a legendary member might be making in another campaign. It's all going to depend on you the user and where I feel you land on the tier system.
Users in tier 1 will basically be considered the Legendary/Hero in a campaign
Users in Tier 2 basically your SR members
Users in tier 3 Full member and below
Post quality and display of signature are two main factors. I only agree that a Legendary member who writes shitposts can be paid with same payment rate of a Full member.
A Full member can write very excellent, quality post like a Legendary member but paying with the same rate of Legendary rank will need more consideration. Are you sure that with a signature for Full member rank, effects will be actually higher than from a Legendary member with average quality posts?
I agree that a Full member with excellent posts deserves to receive higher payment rate but it can be limited to Sr. Member pay rate.