Well, regarding bitmover I think it's clear that we have a different vision of how things are and it's not worth going deeper into our differences.
Each of us is in charge of figuring how what rises to the level of abundance or over abundance and the extent to which we might want to shave our investment portfolio size down.
That's right.
I will say that I know people who live quite well, and they have multiples (if not magnitudes) more than the amount that they need for completely living off of the income from their investments, so surely there sometimes could be challenges to figure out what kinds of ways to spend more money, and I am not necessarily going to blame them for doing something wrong merely because they have wealth levels that go way beyond their income needs (or lifestyle needs).
Yes, I also know people with a lot of money and spending more to die with nothing, they don't even think about it. Of course we are not going to blame them for it, just like we are not going to blame bitmover or others for doing with their money what they want.
It seems that holding a decent amount of value in bitcoin can contribute to such actual overabundance, since many of us may well employ conservative spending styles in accordance with traditional investment portfolio management, but then find that our bitcoin holdings are appreciating in value way faster than we are able to spend it.
Not only bitcoin holdings, that can happen in general with investments but obviously to the regulars of this forum the most normal thing is that our main source of wealth in the future will be bitcoin. But the fact that our wealth continues to grow means that we will be able to spend more and more, as well as invest and donate more if we want to, while not killing the goose that lays the golden eggs, but letting it get bigger and bigger. And if we are lucky, with increasing institutional and state adoption in the next few years, our holdings can appreciate quite a bit.