If anybody really has a problem with someone's posts, just report it to a moderator.
If it gets deleted then you reported it correctly and the system works.
If it doesn't get removed, then that's why we have staff/moderators to make that choice.
Although I agree with the "not needing vigilante rules" part of your post, there's a problem with this part: if posts don't get reported, they don't get removed. And if spammers get paid to produce thousands of posts per week, people grow tired of reporting them (which isn't a paid job). If Mods don't ban users for spam, reporting their posts is a thankless and endless job.If it gets deleted then you reported it correctly and the system works.
If it doesn't get removed, then that's why we have staff/moderators to make that choice.
I have 121 members in the Duelbits campaign 
~
I do however also have a bunch of users who see it as a job where they HAVE to hit x amount of posts but I always tell them that if you are busy or you have shit going on in life just take a break and get back to it when you can do it naturally.
From the campaign thread:~
I do however also have a bunch of users who see it as a job where they HAVE to hit x amount of posts but I always tell them that if you are busy or you have shit going on in life just take a break and get back to it when you can do it naturally.
Make a minimum of 20 eligible (constructive) posts each week that you participate to receive a payment.
Why don't you remove the minimum, and pay a pro-rated amount if users post less?