People can advocate for whatever they want, doesn't mean it will happen. The whole point of this thread for me was that I personally am going to make a few changes in campaigns. Sure people can make suggestions, but in the long run it is my decision on how I want to do things. I will have the company in mind and the forum as I genuinely care about both, but I would like to see members who are genuinely putting in the effort, get rewarded vs accounts getting top dollar because of rank and not putting in the effort.
It is not a bad concept to reward participants based on the quality of their postings regardless of rank, but we shouldn't undervalue the effort taken to achieve top rankings.
Have you ever considered the damages such payroll would cause to the ranking system? The system you're proposing places every profile on the same level but in reality we're not
Trofo started similar pay rate last year..
Quote
Senior Member, Hero Member, Legendary and Staff = 4$ per post => max 25 posts equalling 100$ per week
If you are a high rank who makes decent posts you have nothing to worry about. Basically, I am open to giving a lower rank user a chance at making more money based on their quality and other factors. When a campaign is launched there are 100+ applicants applying to fill 15-20 spots. Managers weed through those applications and choose the best people for the job. It's not 1st come 1st serve.
<Cut the chase>
This is too long to read I doubt anyone on the Internet is going to read all that fr. Money does not influence the quality of one's posts. A quality poster will always be a quality poster, regardless of campaign funding- project owners aren't going to pump money into BTT because they want quality posts on BTT. Lol
I don't think your campaign manager is going to like the last paragraph of your comment though. Haha
I have nothing against that user, but I think they are trying to hard.