~
Thanks for the explanation! I need to remove cryptohodl from my trust list as well.
Although I don’t believe (I hope he didn’t!) he kept keys, his failure to address funding issues makes me not trust him. Too bad cuz he made some great items. Still personally hodling my 1hodlclub items - all funded that should be and funds haven’t moved. Hopefully switched keys was an isolated incident but he should still pay the funding that is owed. Guess we will see if he revives his brand and puts in the work to make things right… or chooses not to
Thanks for the explanation! I need to remove cryptohodl from my trust list as well.
Although I don’t believe (I hope he didn’t!) he kept keys, his failure to address funding issues makes me not trust him. Too bad cuz he made some great items. Still personally hodling my 1hodlclub items - all funded that should be and funds haven’t moved. Hopefully switched keys was an isolated incident but he should still pay the funding that is owed. Guess we will see if he revives his brand and puts in the work to make things right… or chooses not to
No problem! I think he still has a chance to make things right with unfunded coins, I'm not sure what to say about mixing keys and addresses, that seems like pure negligence and hopefully isolated. Funding the unfunded coins would be a good first step to moving forward and may show he actually cares, although I can't say I have any real confidence at this point based on his reaction and subsequent actions, but I'd be happy if he proved me wrong. I don't think we've seen any clear evidence of keeping keys or sweeping yet though.
I don’t remember adding 1HodlUrFundZ to my trust list but I have corrected this error. Apologies… I thought my negative trust would show whatever circlejerk list he was on ♂️
Your negative feedback definitely shows since you are on DefaultTrust, and nobody has excluded you (except MrCryptHodl himself, which he appears to have done last March, but it isn't as relevant at this point because he's not on DT himself anymore). It gets a little confusing because DefaultTrust is like a dynamic web of trust based on user votes (votes done through inclusions/exclusions from other users trust lists). To summarize, those votes essentially pick users who will have sent feedback appear as "trusted" on any users that include "DefaultTrust" in their list, which every user starts off with by default, and also this votes to include those users trust lists, and who they have in their trust lists, which would involve more potential inclusion or exclusion votes, how deep the web goes is the purpose of the "depth" setting on the trust settings page, which by default goes 2 levels deep.
I'm not sure I'm doing a great job explaining this clearly, but LoyceV's guide explains it in much greater detail. Feel free to PM if you need any help with it, you would just need to delete him off your list at the trust settings page assuming you do not agree with his judgement on his feedbacks and/or his trust list inclusions/exclusions, I don't want to derail this thread too much.
