FFS, it's a neutral tag - it really doesn't even matter, as Royse said nobody really cares about a neutral that much.
I respect JollyGood's opinions, but do not always agree, which is fine with both of us. Maybe PM him and ask kindly to remove it if it bothers you so much? As I said, it's a neutral, not a -ve

They may look like simple neutral tags, but apparently they are not. They are negatively influenced neutral tags. Anyway, just as you said, many people would just ignore them. Of course, at BTT everyone has the same rights. Anyone can have their own opinions.
And it seems like JG has a PhD in a user called naim027, and according to it, every person from a specific community is operated by him. How convenient. Case solved.

I got a tag from him recently, even after explaining I wasn't a greedy farmer. If I were I, I would have enrolled in every signature available out there. But in my case, I never applied to any gambling sigs. Obviously, someone would have accepted me. I could have easily made thousands in gambling sigs, but I choose not to. I guess I should have applied to all of them.
What good are these merits do, if one doesn't do sigs?! I know, I know, a signature is a privilege, not a right. But everyone is getting some benefits from them. Don't they! Above rank reputation matters the most at BTT.
-snip-
Did you looked into the fact I never even once applied to any of your sigs? Like I said before, you are a busy person and you may have missed that fact.

[It is what it is, life isn't fair]