From the start this was advertised as Luckycoin restarted at block XXXXX because the chain had essentially been mined by one person for the majority of the last decade, correct? So why after someone on twitter discovered they were able to sync the longer chain did all exchanges freeze deposits and blame some replay attack? The exchanges are older than the fork, there is no risk to them. They just stopped deposits, crashed the market and are killing this coin because they didn't research what they were listing?
There doesn't even seem to be a replay attack just a few transactions that coins be rebroadcast from old wallets. From our perspective, there is some coordination to only let certain people sell this coin.
In case you missed it, the thread I created to document the revival of the OG Lucky was dated 12/28.
Someone saw my post and was able to sync to it much earlier than me.
He started mining from Block 604978
Check the link:
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/lky/block.dws?1604978.htmIt is dated 12/28/2024, 6:31:20 PM (UTC+8:00)
The replay attacks happened as early as around 12/26.
It was around this Block 237849.
https://luckyscan.org/block/700e6328d657a919ad0fd83f71a6ce2b03cc87edb619cc3f251d94e32f3539d2All timestamps are there.
So why blame me for exchanges closing deposits?
A coordinated attack, are you sure?
Show some proof first, don't just spit nonsense.