Are... we talking about me and my list here in place of "the thread listing the scam accusation" and "the owner of the listing"? If so, then rest assured that [once again] that thread is not authoritarian, I will not abuse the list to my own agenda simply because [borrowing your words], "a conflict between you and the owner of the listing".
It was marked as resolved due to the OP's own written statement, on Stake's ANN thread
After much thought, I believe it's time to focus on peace and understanding. While I’ve shared my concerns about certain platforms and their impact, my intention now is to promote awareness and peace. There are many layers to the gambling world, and I’ve seen both good and bad through my experiences. However, it's essential to evaluate the consequences before diving in, especially with platforms that have complex operations and hidden agendas.
As we move forward, I hope others find peace in evaluating their choices and actions. While my path has led me away from these platforms, I wish everyone the best in their journeys. Peace and awareness are the first steps to creating a healthier mindset, both in gambling and life. Stay aware, stay strong, and remember to always take care of yourselves.
Was it a wrong interpretation that the case can be marked as resolved by OP wanting to focus on peace and understanding? Move forward? And, though his path let him away from these platforms, he wish everyone the best in their journey. I'll more than happy to change it given an insight from other party.
One thing that I think I need to say though, is that I find myself really surprised that you thought I will do such action, that I will abuse the list for a personal annoyance toward someone.
I've seen your
other post on Cinexrino's thread, I won't reply on both topics to say the same thing, especially overthere while I haven't posted before and I think it's a bit off-topic on top of that.
I saw this case (and the other ones from OP regarding this platform) were marked are closed and resolved in your lists, I was surprised since I still see OP posting angry messages and serious accusations against this casino here and in the ANN thread of the platform. So I looked at this topic and the other one regarding accusations of illegal activities in India, and I didn't find anything showing those accusations have been addressed and solved. I deduced from this, it was related in a way or another to the open conflict between you and him, and you've decided to close the case so as to not have to deal with him anymore. I guessed you've chosen the "resolved" option because you've considered having made enough for his cases, but unfortunately users having no clues about your conflict with him could think those accusations have really been adressed and won't bother to check by themselves further. So I suggested Kingbj21 to do the same as what Cinexrino did in order to signal his cases are still open and not addressed.
Thank you for the honest explanation and POV. I can understand that from others' shoes, who only read briefly [as we have to admit that reading all of OP's post, all of them, across threads, boards, topics, and theories, and follow what transpires in full is almost impossible] can perhaps lead to a confusion on why the case is marked as resolved while the OP still... that.
I can assure you and I will really appreciate if you would be so kind to bear in mind for future cases and reference that any conflict or heated argument I have with a casino player or fellow overseers during a resolution attempt will not affect their status on my list in a sense that I will one-sidedly mark it as resolved out of spite or other reason. I'll most likely just leave my device, "walk it off" by chilling and handling other issues and calmed myself and return only when I am sure I am not influenced by anything that agitate me in the past.
One case-on-point will be the case of
Rollbit v. tetaeridanus where circumstances kinda stacked in an unfavorable situation, with him being in a bad state and I had a situation myself that his several jabs annoyed me, so I walked away and take the spectator seat, and returned to the case when I think it's time to return to it and re-try to get his situation resolved, all while the status of the case is "in progress" instead of marked as "resolved".
Now, moving to OP's situation
itself themselves, I will honestly appreciate your input: do you think the status should be rewritten as "in progress" or perhaps other status? With reference to what OP said as quoted above, as well as the nature of OP's post in general [achieved by reading his entire post history] and the likelihood of Stake addressing it formally and officially is next to the birth of velociraptor within this year?
For added reference and to answer what probably bewildering your mind, if I may speak what's on my mind freely [though I am sure it'll offend OP, but pretty much anything I said at this point is an offense for him, so... [shrug]], the lack of enthusiasm and response to OP's thread is, IMO, not due to the status on the list, but it's because most of the overseer who frequently come to this board already read OP's threads and the messages he tried to convey, with some overseer even tried to explain patiently, and it came to a deaf ear. So they leave. Another come, did the same, ended up with similar result, and they too leave. Ultimately, the low traction of his threads.