Tottenham 1-0 Liverpool
Has Liverpool lost a truck like Manchester City? Liverpool did not play well in the last two matches. Manchester United was not in good form. Even then, Liverpool failed to win the Premier League home match. The match was drawn 2-2.
The semi-final of the EFL Cup was quite important for Liverpool. The opponent was Tottenham, a renowned team. This is true. However, in the last few matches, we have seen Tottenham's weak and irregular performance. I expected Liverpool to win this match. However, Tottenham won the match by a margin of 1-0. Liverpool's players played well. They created many attacking opportunities. But the attacking players completely failed to break Tottenham's defense. As a result, despite 7 on target shots, Liverpool's players could not score a single goal.
when playing against Man United in the EPL it was clear that Liverpool's performance had declined and at that time Liverpool should have been able to win because of course Liverpool usually always appear impressive in every match and indeed I personally did not expect that in the match against Tottenham in the EFL there would be a defeat for Liverpool of course this is very surprising for me too because Liverpool has not recovered its strength after playing against Man United in the EPL.
it is true that Liverpool created so many opportunities and from ball possession Liverpool was also superior but unfortunately here Arne slot failed to make a good strategy and of course what succeeded was Ange's strategy Ange's technique was really extraordinary and actually if it wasn't offside Tottenham would have been superior because they managed to score 2 goals but unfortunately only 1 goal was considered valid by the referee. but I personally am currently very worried about Liverpool because of course if their performance does not improve then there will definitely be difficulties in the upcoming matches in the EPL. at this time Liverpool must be really more vigilant because surely in 2025 all teams will be more serious about winning.