Harry Kane is like a king without a crown, he has been the top scorer several times, but has not managed to win a single trophy. And Kane is much better than Erling Haaland, he scored more goals and even did it with Tottenham Hotspur, a club that is not as great as Man City or Liverpool and other big clubs in the English league. Kane has good creativity and individual ability as a striker, while Erling Haaland, he still relies on teamwork, and as we see now, when several of Man City's main players are injured, it is quite difficult for Erling Haaland to score goals in every match.
However, even so, with his young age, Erling Haaland can still improve his ability and creativity in attacking and scoring goals, and if he succeeds in improving it, Erling Haaland could surpass the record that Kane has set.
Completely agreed about Harry Kane and his achievements with now he is in right place where he can win crown as well even I feel he had to accept Bayern Munich offer few years back because mostly soccer fans understand Tottenham is not had ability to big clubs for the title race but still even this is late but right decision which is now giving him better chance of winning trophies while with Bayern Munich surely he had good chance of winning Champions League even this will take time but now possible.
I am not in favour of comparing players because all are having own style and level but no doubt Harry Kane is much better and creative then Erling Haaland who is having the good number of goals but still not near the Harry Kane in many things which give him good advantage, and also he deserves better name in soccer world while we have comparison of few good players of current generation.