For example, if my money is still in for betting, I will 100% get a bigger win if your consequence is true. Or conversely, we choose to make a profit but not by winning big, only double is better. or I have to choose these two concepts. The gambling business is how to confuse addicts who become indecisive. they have all the systems from the bookie with a 99% chance of winning big. different from us, only 1%, even if you take sides, 99% will definitely lose
I have never used cash out before, I just don't see the point. I often place small bets, and if I lose it's not a problem for me, but if I win it can be a big win, so I don't think about taking my money before the end of the match. And sometimes it happens that a team can score even in extra time, so I don't see the point in canceling a bet that could be a winning one. Maybe if I placed big bets I would rate this feature differently.