@holydarkness, 

Your repeated attempts to deflect and trivialize the seriousness of Stake’s unethical practices only expose your alignment with their tactics. Let me set the record straight, because your narrative is misleading at best and complicit at worst. 

1. 100 Days of GDPR Violations – Stake’s Complete Disregard for Law

It’s been 100 days since I submitted a formal GDPR data request as a fully KYC3-verified customer. The law is clear: 
- Maximum Deadline: 30 days, extendable to 90 in “exceptional circumstances.” Stake has exceeded this without providing any valid justification or update. 
- Data Access is a Right, Not a Privilege: Stake’s delays and obfuscation show contempt for GDPR, transparency, and its own customers. 

For 100 days, Stake has: 
- Ignored my legal rights. 
- Closed over 30 support tickets without meaningful resolution. 
- Claimed endless “escalations” to phantom departments that produce zero results. 

This is a textbook example of GDPR non-compliance, and I’m escalating this with regulators. By downplaying this issue, you’re defending clear violations of international law. 

2. Mislabeling My Case as Resolved 

You falsely marked my case as “resolved,” using my reflective post on awareness and peace as justification. Let me be unequivocal: 
- That post was about moving forward personally, NOT about Stake addressing my grievances. 
- My accusations against Stake remain valid, unresolved, and pressing. 

Here’s the ongoing list of unresolved issues: 
- Fraudulent VIP Bonuses: Platinum 1 members receiving $0.10 reloads after wagering millions? This is both insulting and fraudulent. 
- Withdrawal Blocks: Arbitrary restrictions without explanations or timelines. 
- Illegal Operations in India: Stake uses unlawful UPI payment systems to target users in jurisdictions where online gambling is banned. 
- Rigged Games: Evidence of predatory practices across their platform, especially in blackjack and other casino games. 

Your claim that personal conflicts don’t affect your decisions doesn’t hold up. By misrepresenting my case as resolved, you’ve misled others and undermined the purpose of your list. If you care about fairness, update my case to “in progress” or “unresolved” immediately. 

3. The Stake Circus Crew 🎪 

Let’s talk about the cast of characters enabling this circus: 
- Eddie: The master manipulator, building his empire on deception and stolen funds. 
- AHOYBRAUSE: The sycophantic fanboy, more invested in defending Stake’s reload crumbs than addressing systemic fraud. 
- You, holydarkness: The so-called overseer, selectively blind to the mountain of evidence against Stake while silencing dissent with bureaucratic maneuvers. 

Instead of holding Stake accountable, you’re performing damage control for a company that flouts the law, mocks its customers, and rigs its systems for profit. 



@Saint-loup, 

I appreciate your objective observations. You’re absolutely correct that my case being marked as resolved misrepresents the truth and risks misleading other users into thinking these issues have been addressed. For clarity: 
- Nothing has been resolved. Stake’s GDPR violations, fraudulent practices, and predatory systems remain unaddressed. 
- Transparency is vital. Mislabeling my case damages the integrity of dispute-tracking systems and leaves other victims without recourse. 

Your suggestion that I clarify my case’s status is appreciated, but the responsibility ultimately lies with those maintaining these lists to ensure accuracy. 



To Stake’s Fan Club and Defenders 

To the die-hard apologists clinging to Stake’s narrative: 
- Stop gaslighting users who bring forward valid concerns. 
- Recognize that defending a platform built on deceit makes you complicit in its actions. 

Special shout-out to: 
- AHOYBRAUSE: Your blind loyalty is as laughable as Stake’s “provably fair” claims. 
- HolyDarkness: By silencing dissent and misrepresenting cases, you’ve aligned yourself with a fraudulent empire. 



Call to Action 

To the broader community: 
1. File Complaints with Regulators: Stake’s GDPR violations alone warrant severe penalties. 
2. Expose Their Practices: Share your experiences and evidence of their fraud. 
3. Demand Accountability: Don’t let Stake and its enablers continue unchecked. 

To @holydarkness and @Saint-loup: This isn’t just about my case—it’s about exposing the systemic issues with Stake and holding them accountable. You can either stand for transparency and fairness or remain part of the problem. 

The storm is here, and Stake’s house of cards is coming down.