No oo, we all know that this are animals, and they don't have the knowledge that humans possess, and another thing you also need to understand is that they don't have the knowledge to know what's at stake in that race, so it's not ideal to judge a rich and poor Bitcoin investor accumulation capabilities with this video, because if you even look at it closely, the rabbit is very clueless on what is required of him and the tortoise was just moving straight forward believing that it's the only way out of that place, so it's a wrong video to use in describing the accumulation process of a rich Bitcoin investor and a poor Bitcoin investor.
The only way a poor Bitcoin investor can accumulate more Bitcoin than a rich Bitcoin investor is if the rich guy fail to be consistent in his accumulation, aside that, their is no way a poor Bitcoin investor can accumulate more than the rich guy because their purchasing power is not the same.
And lastly, the rich guy have the financial leverage to buy aggressively, more than the poor guy during a dip, unless he is not serious, but if the rich guy is absolutely serious, their is no way the poor guy can accumulate more than him.
[/quote]
I don't see the need why you guys are arguing over nothing pahaps this statement has been addressed by JJG in the comments above but  for the benefits of doubt I will still trow more light to it, surely even though this image provided by Pi-network314159 lacks more clearity in term of his way of describing the rich and the poor investment strategy or even as it is an animated video, but I see some sense to his narration. You made you point clear in the paragraph I bolded @Bariku1 which talks about "consistency"  and of which I think the moral of that video is all about consistency. If you look closely in that video, you will notice that the Tortise was consistent more than the rabbit, even though the rabbit was more opportuned than the Tortise, although the fast move made by the rabbit at first instance look like it made a large investment and later slow down. If it was consistent as it was when it started the race he may have won. So surely sometimes you don't interpret things the way you see them, you should be able to understand things beyond and or think differently and perhaps you will surely understand the message it passes even though it was an animal but the message is important because consistency in  this case does not only apply to human but also to animal.