the only reason why harry Kane get disrespected is because he has not been fortunate when it comes to winning trophies if not, kane is more of a complete forward far ahead of halland who is just good at scoring more of a tap in and less of assisting or driving ball from center till the front and scores. spurs didn't also have the kind of coach man city has and when you even compare the players at spurs when harry kane was playing their and the current players and man city that makes the work erling halland is doing easy for him, you understand that the system haland is operating in is more convenient for good performance than what kane worked with while he and son did most of the collective brilliance together. kanes exit has left spurs struggling but should halland leave man city and they are able to recover from their injuries, the club might not really suffer much. but in the end, both are fantastic players that have mastered the art of goal scoring and have through that built a great name for themselves.