My case is also unadressed, hence I am trying to find a support on my flag to try to get to spotlight. I am getting muted in this forum since the day I have written about rollbit. I deserve my compansation but sadly “if razer doesn’t respond” or I don’t get enough support on my case; my case will be counted as resolved by holydarkness. Even if it isn’t.
Problem with HolyDarkness is that he is an incompetent self-proclaimed legal adviser clown!
What our self-proclaimed legal adviser clown forgot to do is to take a look at Art.
3 GDPR Territorial scope of the articles he quoted to "justifiy" that a Stake victim has to submit personal documents to an illegal and criminal online casino operation to get the data he is entitled to get!
1. This Regulation applies to the processing of personal data in the context of the activities of an establishment of a controller or a processor in the (European) Union, regardless of whether the processing takes place in the Union or not.
2. This Regulation applies to the processing of personal data of data subjects who are in the Union by a controller or processor not established in the Union, where the processing activities are related to:
(a) the offering of goods or services, irrespective of whether a payment of the data subject is required, to such data subjects in the Union; or
(b) the monitoring of their behaviour as far as their behaviour takes place within the Union.
Point 1)An illegal and criminal online casino operation can not have a legal establishment by law and the European Union GDPR articles are not applicable here!
Point 2)A victim of an illegal and criminal online casino operation is not obligated by law to submit personal documents to the offender!
Point 3)Even if you hallucinate that Stake is a legal establishment (quote non), the quoted GDPR articles are still not applicable, because:
1) The processor or controller is in Australia and Serbia, which are not part of the European Union.
2) The subject is in India, which is not part of the European Union.