Re: Beware of DuckDice.io – My Disappointing Experience and Fairness Issues🚨
When Kirito89 was asking me repeatedly to give him permission to post those emails and conversations publicly, why didn’t anyone stop him or point out that such information shouldn’t be requested publicly? Why didn’t anyone remind him that this kind of data shouldn’t be shared so casually?
I had initially refused because I knew the risks involved, but it felt like if I didn’t comply, people__perhaps even you_might be the first to consider me a cheater, blackmailer, or accuser.
You do realize he asked for this permission more than four times, don’t you? Yet I don’t think you’ve reviewed those exchanges thoroughly.
I had initially refused because I knew the risks involved, but it felt like if I didn’t comply, people__perhaps even you_might be the first to consider me a cheater, blackmailer, or accuser.
You do realize he asked for this permission more than four times, don’t you? Yet I don’t think you’ve reviewed those exchanges thoroughly.
Umm... actually, I can't find the other instances where he asked permission to publish the data, other than on #94. Unless I am wrong? Do you mind to point us out to the other --at least-- three other instances?
That said, I’ll ask you directly, Holydarkness: Do you personally believe his accusation that I blackmailed them is true? If you believe his claim is true, I would respect your decision to oppose my flag against Duckdice. But if you believe his accusation is false, Support my flag against them until they address and clear everything publicly.
Given that question directly entailed by a term, where if I believe his accusation is true then I have to oppose the flag and if I believe it's wrong then I have to support the flag, I will refrain from giving my opinion for the time being, thank you.
Your flag is based on the whole issues as depicted on your thread, and to support the flag I'll have to affirm to the best of my knowledge that what transpired is true, while what transpired and the reason of the flag is not just about the multi-acc. Or... is it?
So, without further context to validate/invalidate that part of the situation, I don't think I can pull a definitive answer.
Anyway, I realized we had an unfinished discussion about your review that got deleted, I understand correctly that it's against TP's policy to post a review about an experience that happened more than a year ago? Granted, I can find a mention that they prefer a fresh review that is not older than 12 months, but not about they'll delete it as it's against their policy.
Just to keep us assured, did they send you an email about the removal and explained to you that it got deleted due to the reason you specified to us?