And an L2 is absolutely, positively, not Bitcoin because they completely isolate the user from the underlying asset: they could replace the backing with any other asset if they wanted to and the users would not be exposed to the change. It's rather bizarre to call a non-Bitcoin currency a "shitcoin", but an L2 that is functionally the same exact thing is somehow, "okay".
What's "bizarre" is that it's been months that you keep spreading the same FUD all over the forum, while it's been perpetually explained to you that this is false. An L2 of Bitcoin uses the same currency, and secures that in case of any party needing to return to L1 can do it permissionlessly. That's why it's called a
Layer 2, and not an IOU.