that's exactly the issue i'm pointing out. you are misleading players here.
in the ToS, you reserve the right to request KYC at any time for any reason, which is completely different from what you are claiming here.
Don't expect that OP will change their marketing strategy. They will try to convince you by saying that "we allow the users to play anonymously as long as they don't breach the terms". Most of the casinos allow the users to play anonymously until they do anything wrong or win anything big. So, there is no difference between Betpanda and any other casino (where it isn't mandatory) KYC verification requirement. OP is also proud of their misleading marketing strategy
exactly, it's just a marketing gimmick. to me, if you say you are KYC free, that should mean you don't enforce KYC ever. and as you said, every reputable casino has the same KYC terms, but they don't advertise themselves as KYC free.
hypothetically speaking, what's stopping the casino from hiding behind "you breached our terms" without providing proof that the player DID breach the terms?
we have seen this happen many times with other casinos using the same excuse to ban players and deny wins.