Theory which relies on Nakomoto Coefficient to measure network decentralization states that nodes placed at one place are not decentralized at all. Particularly when we talk solely about nodes and try to measure their influence on network decentralization we need to answer following questions
Thus, I insist that contribution of this small country into existing decentralization will be miserable
even if the relevant nodes will be installed on every street corner.
Imagine, for example, currently we have 1,000,000 nodes spread throughout the world, then Nayib Bukele comes with his proposal which wants to make every household in El Salvador run a node.
At the moment: 1,000,000 nodes
Later: 1,000,000 + 1,530,000 nodes
Which is better between the two conditions? don't say you will answer the first one. Then, have you read the entire article from Supra? try opening it again & look carefully at the Client Decentralization section. I don't want to argue about this, just want to make people aware that this is good news, even if it only has a small positive impact, it's still a positive impact.
