I really don't. Every voter would have the same budget of votes. So yes, a voter might spend all of his votes on a "buddy", but that's their right as a citizen. All of what you are talking about here occurs in today's elections where people are forced to vote on every decision--it's called campaigning. It's not different if the candidate goes to neighborhoods to gather votes in the current system.

And perhaps you missed this nuance in my description, but I am talking about every voter getting the same amount of voting power--so it is in no way connected to how much money a voter has or doesn't have.

(By the way, is there some reason you have to be so extremely nasty and personal in every reply? This is the "Serious Discussion" forum after all...).