so again yes if everyone is given 1000 power unit means everyone has 1000 power units..
but.. unless you have a protocol rule that only limits one power unit per election, there will be abuses of use. as said multiple times if people can ignore certain elections and then use multiple units on one specific election, unfairness ensues, it can sway a election in favour of certain representative or proposal that may go against the overall community preference.
But why is that unfair? Every citizen gets the same exact amount of voting power. If they truly don't know about, or don't care about any of the issues or candidates of previous elections, then why should they be forced to give up their right as a citizen to participate?
All that said, the aspect of this idea wherein voting tokens rollover to the next election is an implementation detail, and the idea still works if for each ballot every voter could simply vote their allotted points on a single ballot.
have you even thought of a way to prevent one individual collecting 1m vote power??
have you even thought of a way to prevent one individual with 1m vote power then using it on one candidate??
Each individual would be allotted (say) 1000 voting tokens per year. So it would take 1000 years to do that.
Buying votes is illegal now (if Harris had won, Musk probably would have been prosecuted for what he did in the election for instance), and it would be illegal in this system too, so an individual could not sell their voting tokens to anybody else for instance.
And another straightforward limitation would be to put a cap on the number of tokens a citizen could spend on a single ballot, e.g. 2000 (two years worth) of tokens.