As the quote which you provided says: “We reserve the right to”, which does not equal that this will absolutely happen.
that's exactly the issue i'm pointing out. you are misleading players here.
in the ToS, you reserve the right to request KYC at any time for any reason, which is completely different from what you are claiming here.
Mate I don't see any point of misunderstanding here, the statement made by the Betpanda representatives here is the same as what is one of the terms and conditions unless maybe you are misunderstanding both statements when a team says that they reserve the right to ask for KYC at any time is same as not asking for verification outrightly unless there are suspicious activities noticed on the account.
Don't get me wrong, they can still decide to ask for verification at the point of account creation if the IP is suspected to have been on the casino before now, so for sure it same thing but being said in different ways.
I understand what Zwei say although its not really mandatory to provide KYC but there are certain point that KYC will be ask if there's certain factor triggers it. That's why its not really fully anonymous casino if this situation happen. Although I understand that casino need to conduct an investigation happen so people really could expect that this requirements will be asked later on.
KYC is not really needed upon signing up or when they gamble and people should not be so confident with that set up and they need to be ready or have this thoughts that later on they will ask this requirements so that they won't get surprise on this matter. This is how important reading their TOS so that we know what future implementation will come to them. But overall everything is fine since this is common implementation nowadays. What's important is they are trying to build good reputation here in Bitcointalk.