OK, instead of increasing the 21 million Supply Cap, what's everyone's personal opinion on the "NAT token"?
Our mission is to redefine the Bitcoin mining incentive model by directing newly generated $DMT-NAT tokens to miners who win blocks, using the principles of Digital Matter Theory. This initiative aims to ensure a long-term, sustainable mining economy and to maintain the security and decentralization of the Bitcoin blockchain as the subsidy decreases.
https://natgmi.com/Technically, I haven't DYOR yet, but their F.A.Q. posts that NAT is a "mining reward" based on Bitcoin's difficulty metrics. NAT is a BRC-20 token, which is a little disappointing if you ask me. Runes Protocol would be better for onchain tokens in Bitcoin.
But let's make a presumption that there's a very liquid market for NAT, would it be a concept that the Bitcoin community be ready to accept for the network to continue paying for security?