Dear Betpanda Team,

Thank you for your "detailed" response. I would like to address your points one by one:

1) KYC and prior knowledge of BC limitations:
My account was blocked before I completed the KYC process. Neither you nor Betpanda could have known that I had been limited on BC unless I disclosed it, which I did here in this thread. I find it hard to believe that BC informed BetBy of my limitations, and I am equally certain that BetBy could not have communicated this information to you.

2) Specific violations:
Regarding the alleged violations, I would like to respond to each point:

a) "When was the bet placed in relation to the event happening in real time"
What exactly do you mean by this? Are you suggesting I somehow "predict the future" and place bets before a goal is scored or a significant event happens? That’s absurd. What’s the issue with betting on Team 1 after Team 2 scores a goal? The odds increase, and it’s perfectly reasonable for a player to take advantage of that. I’ve been betting for years, and no one, not even BC, has ever accused me of fraud.

b) "What the odds offered by other providers were in relation to the ones user bet on"
What do other providers' odds have to do with me? I placed my bets solely on your platform without checking other operators’ odds. This argument is completely irrelevant. If one of your odds was incorrect, you could have simply voided the bet and returned the funds to me as a balance to use again (even in the casino). Were all five of my bets based on incorrect odds? That’s impossible.

c) "Was arbitrage betting involved"
I have educated myself about arbitrage betting, and my response is the same as above: it’s possible to benefit from differences in odds without doing so intentionally. Suggesting that all my bets fall into this category is unrealistic.

d) "If any other technique or tactic was used to gain an edge over the house"
I don’t even know what you mean by this, and frankly, I don’t care. I have never used any fraudulent techniques or tactics.

In summary, these accusations are unfounded. I demand my betting history to prove the legitimacy of my wagers and my deposit to be refunded.

3) Deposit confiscation:
While I understand your policy on deposits not being refundable after bets are placed, confiscating my deposit is unjustifiable. If you consider my winnings illegitimate, you may choose to void them (though I disagree), but my $1,000 deposit is my own money and should be refunded.

4) Betting history transparency:
You argue that providing my betting history is irrelevant, yet it would allow me to verify and demonstrate my innocence. If you are confident in your case, I see no reason why this information cannot be shared. Transparency is crucial in cases like this, and withholding this data raises concerns.

5) Clarification on the term "scam":
When I use the term "scam" in the title of this thread, I am referring specifically to the illegal confiscation of my deposit, as also highlighted by other users in this thread.

I hope this clarifies my stance. I look forward to your response.

Sincerely,

- bettingfede98