Hence if it’s just 30 days can someone explained why we have tohit the 300+ good post mark and why it wasn’t open for at least 30+ report… not really after the feature anyways but I’m just curious WHY?? Apt is it just how it was implemented in the SMF
Only administration can say why this number. But, it is certainly to avoid abuse, and so that only those who make good reports have access to this extra information.
I think that before we reach 300 reports, it would be interesting to understand why some are considered "bad" reports. But, we only know that x were good and x were bad.
But, if all of this has worked as intended to keep the forum minimally tidy, I also don't see a big issue in making changes.
I just wonder if it wouldn't be interesting, even for the forum's resources, to eliminate posts or topics that only have "." after editing by the author. But that is another matter.