What does this have for the possibility of allowing mixers campaign on this forum again?
Tornado cash is a decentralized mixer which should be known as coinjoin. But I noticed theymos is calling centralized mixers as mixers while calling decentralized mixers as coinjoin when he banned centralized mixers signature campaign on this forum.
Theymos posted this:
The question I want to ask is that are decentralized mixers among. I mean in the court case. Tornado cash is not for bitcoin but at least it is still a mixer but decentralized. Or theymos is referring to only centralized mixers?
Tornado cash is a decentralized mixer which should be known as coinjoin. But I noticed theymos is calling centralized mixers as mixers while calling decentralized mixers as coinjoin when he banned centralized mixers signature campaign on this forum.
Theymos posted this:
For the mixer policy to be reversed, the legal environment would have to improve a lot. I think that one of these would have to happen:
-
- Congress passes laws which explicitly protect mixers.
- The administration ends up being extremely pro-privacy, better than 99% of politicians in office.
-
- Congress passes laws which explicitly protect mixers.
- The administration ends up being extremely pro-privacy, better than 99% of politicians in office.
The question I want to ask is that are decentralized mixers among. I mean in the court case. Tornado cash is not for bitcoin but at least it is still a mixer but decentralized. Or theymos is referring to only centralized mixers?