No.
Blockchain evidence doesn't prove me being Smokerface
You've admitted to having ownership of
bc1qcvdfnn0c06dewqtexjlev9z4nspwku5kat4wd9SmokerFace (bc1qjrjvr3a20rhf7vqdr2rvcexx28j3d8e7plyje9) sent 0.00060960 BTC to you (worldofcoins) (bc1qcvdfnn0c06dewqtexjlev9z4nspwku5kat4wd9) in this transaction.
The blockchain proves at a minimum that you received 0.00060960 BTC directly from SmokerFace. What's the relationship between you both? There is no denying that there is one, as you clearly transacted with each other in the linked transaction.
"bc1qcvdfnn0c06dewqtexjlev9z4nspwku5kat4wd9", and "bc1qc240qa82qergkzzwpasg8ehp0clzt6gkzznwhc" (Also belong to me most likely).
The later address "3EUhPUmdDcck8MeGSoBoPzRVSjDAZVdh68" (I don't know of which site is, but it most likely belong to account, or someone other than SF I traded with or had a deal with, I deal with a lot of people so I don't know who that might be, I could've provided logs if the person if from a p2p exchange, or a trade through dm but it would consume unnecessary time, and cannot guarantee I will find that person).
Good catch. Except its worth pointing out that both addresses sent the funds to a "hop" address before the exchange address to break the connection. So it looks like this:
bc1qjrjvr3a20rhf7vqdr2rvcexx28j3d8e7plyje9 -> bc1qcvdfnn0c06dewqtexjlev9z4nspwku5kat4wd9 -> 3EUhPUmdDcck8MeGSoBoPzRVSjDAZVdh68
https://archive.is/yYtUz