Thank you for pointing out that the writing styles, This supports my explanation that the posts in question were not authored by me. However, I repeat I'm aware I made a mistake by sharing my account information and I take responsibility for it.
If you take responsibility for it then you should accept the ban.
Think about it, where is the logic if a member plagiarises
does get banned yet if the same member gives access to their account to a third party who then plagiarises on their account
does not get banned. What message dose that send out to others?
It's real, I just had a Telegram conversation with him which I can provide here on request.
While I would say it was a very foolish idea for him to give a spammer access to his account to participate in a sig campaign on his behalf (he could've just sent the campaign money to his address for example), it technically was not his own plagiarism.
Not to doubt you at all but just for a moment if we accept it was an innocent mistake, should there be zero sanction?
As you stated, he could have just sent the campaign funds to him instead. Why would someone happily not accept their campaign payments by giving their account to someone else unless they had another account they could use to either rank up if it was new or capitalise on if it was already enrolled on a campaign? The alternative would have been to complete the quota himself and send the money to his friend.
Did the OP ask the Stake manager if he would be allowed permission for someone else to post on his behalf? Did the OP ask the Stake manager to change his payment address until the foreseeable future? If this was an innocent mistake, he created the problem simply by allowing someone else to access his account when it was not necessary and that person abused that trust therefore he (not the other party) are now facing the consequences.