In as much as City won with that awful display from Chelsea I'd like to know what is Enzo Maresca doing as a manager with Jackson on the pitch, starting him every single game? This is something both the board and the fans need to question Enzo Maresca of because this man Jackson has been killing the build up of Chelsea since the beginning of this season, if he had converted some of those chances including the ones that was ruled out for offside I see no reason why the defense of Manchester City shouldn't be scared of him whenever he's with the ball and you'd agree with me that Chelsea should have won this game if he had been up to standard, he should be ashamed of himself and Enzo on the other hand is not acting as a strict manager as he claim to be.
I think when it comes to high stake games, Nicolas Jackson cannot perform effectively and I think this is suppose to be a concern for Enzo Maresca. He should be looking for a replacement for Nicolas Jackson a player with proven track record of success which can be able to add a strong attack to their front line. It was a impressive performance from the Manchester City side as they were able to come from one goal down to win the match.
When it comes to Jackson I don't think Enzo Maresca need to think twice when making a selection because the man in question is not functioning at all, he can't do anything that the fans will applaud him. To be honest last season Jackson was more better than this very guy we are seeing, I don't know if he has lost last season's confidence. When will he (Jackson) see all these mistakes he has been making and say to himself and his teammates that he'll improve?
At some point I said Jackson is not an attacker that he was forced to be in that position and if I'm the owner I don't see why Enzo Maresca should be keeping his job till this very moment, to me he is a bad manager for preferring one of the worse attacker in the EPL as his best number 9. Chelsea are not showing any sign of getting a new number 9.