Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Bitcoin puzzle transaction ~32 BTC prize to who solves it
by
WanderingPhilospher
on 26/01/2025, 22:39:18 UTC
I do not have these found wallets / prefixes because I think they will show me a pattern. I have them as PoW that I completed a specific range, in case I wanted to swap ranges with someone down the road.
I have them from the 40 to the 7F ranges. Not grouped into a select few of leading characters.
The one you posted is closer than the one I posted.

"in fact there are many wallets with similar prefixes"

I may have translated this wrong (English). What I mean is, there are more than a few wallets with similar prefixes between the wallet I wrote and the one you wrote.

Now the interesting thing is that you still haven't given the HEX code of the wallet. lol
You just said you're close to me. Smiley

"..in case I wanted to swap ranges with someone down the road"
Okay send a private message. (But I'm sure you won't.)

"I do not have these found wallets / prefixes because I think they will show me a pattern."
Be careful with this word, KTimesG can get you in trouble. Take care, my friend.
I would not trade ranges with you because you are no doing full ranges. It seems you are looking at prefixes found, then skipping ahead by x amount, based on your mathematical probabilistic.
Ranges do not mean prefixes. Make sense?

I'm not worried about ktimesg, because I agree with him.

Yes, you can say a prefix of x amount length, is found on average, every x amount of keys, and skip ahead after finding one. But then you have to rely on if your skip size was too large.

All good, all I am saying is if you give anyone a starting hex, they can tell you the closest prefix to it, after running some hashes towards it.