It is not just you, it seems by far the near total consensus on this particular ban is to not oppose it.
The OP waits for replies in the thread then decides to make walls of text replies as he quotes but apart from apologies and (many) paragraphs starting off as "thanks" the crux of the issues does not change. If his claims are to be believed, he by his own admission allowed someone else to access his account in order to meet his campaign quota for him to be recipient of the campaign payment.
The OP waits for replies in the thread then decides to make walls of text replies as he quotes but apart from apologies and (many) paragraphs starting off as "thanks" the crux of the issues does not change. If his claims are to be believed, he by his own admission allowed someone else to access his account in order to meet his campaign quota for him to be recipient of the campaign payment.
The PM links have no context - it's just "post here so I can get signature money".
I wish we could ban everyone who just posts for $ and nothing else, but I'll start with not opposing this ban.
Yay BCT!
I wish we could ban everyone who just posts for $ and nothing else, but I'll start with not opposing this ban.
Yay BCT!