The walls of text the OP is posting in this thread do not seem to be AI generated. What seems to be happening is the OP is posting walls of text addressing each individual reply in the thread (thus the length) and there is no evidence at all hat he is using AI.
He failed to answer the questions I asked about whether he informed the Stake campaign manager and asked permission to allow someone else to use his account to post. The questions about the payment address not being changed after the new user logged in also an issue when it comes to believing his story.
If someone is to create an appeal thread to unban their account, they have no business using AI generated texts. Besides, he quoted and replied to about 10 persons. How was it possible to use AI to reply to the 10 different posts. It will be more time consuming and the results would probably be very much unconnected with the ongoing conversation. So, I don't think the allegation of using AI generated words is true. Although, it will be funny if it's true.
I read Op's story and have this advice for him if he is actually still following the thread. Admitting that it's your fault for your account ban is not enough to unban you, ofcourse it must always be your fault. If there's any special way you have helped the forum in the past, this is the time to present it in order to convince the admin that you are an asset to the forum. If there's none, otilo, it's gone.