Talking about the difference between prayer and action is not a bad point.  Word-choices have consequences and sometimes can end up sending messages that might not have had been intended by the writer.

I will agree that sometimes some member, including but not limited to yours truly, will sometimes blow our interpretation out proportion and even sometimes end up going out on a bit of a tangent in order to make some side point that might not have had been the intention of the writer to bring up such topic.   Part of the nature of forums like this (and threads like this) is to bat around ideas, and we are not always going to agree.  We are not always going to understand or agree with the interpretation of the sender, and sometimes we are going to misunderstand.  For sure, some members are more accurate, more credible and more genuine than others, yet it might not always be recognized/appreciated by one or two posts.


We are not always going to agree on interpretation, and surely many of us likely already know that preparation (and action) can be quite powerful as compared to strategies that involve waiting and even blindly swinging and hoping that everything works out.  Even if you, EarnOnVictor, were not referring to blindly swinging or situations in which guys fail/refuse to sufficiently/adequately prepare, your post still ended up triggering that kind of a response from Shadiq and followed up  by me to show that I considered Shadiq's response to highlight some decently good points, even if both he and I might have had misunderstood your deep down and supposedly true intentions.


I doubt that anyone has to change their habits, yet there could be circumstances in which people might proclaim that they don't have any or they have low levels of discretionary income, yet we might likely notice that they have some discretionary income, and they make choices how to spend their money.  Sure, some folks might choose to spend their money on some things rather than other things, yet at the same time, they might also proclaim that they don't have any discretionary income, when it in fact appears that they do have discretionary income.  They are just defining discretionary income in a way that is different from  how someone else might define discretionary income.  Nothing wrong with that.  People make choices, and sometimes they truly might not have any discretionary income and truly folks who have more discretionary income will have more abilities to invest into bitcoin, yet they still would need to choose investing into bitcoin in order to benefit from their advantage of having higher discretionary income than another person.

Part of the idea behind discretionary income is the idea of having choices in regards to how to spend it, and surely there are a lot of people who have very little discretionary income and there are some folks who do not have any discretionary income.. but at the same time, some folks might have more discretionary income than they had thought that they had, yet they might be ranking their preferences differently, and perhaps there might be some folks who have options to work 40 hours, yet they purposefully choose to work 20 hours per week and to earn less income.  People surely have the right to choose those kinds of matters, and sometimes the reason that people choose one kind of balance versus another kind of balance is not very clear to an outsider, and surely there are people who have way more disadvantages than others, so they may have to work 40 hours or more to earn an extra $100, and another person might ONLY have to work 1-2 hours in order to earn an extra $100. There can be ways that people can increase their advantages, yet sometimes there may be some folks who are limited and/or trapped in regards to how much they might be able to increase their advantages.