Was it me who shifted the narrative? No. I begged him not to do this. I even asked Kirito89, "Is it a coincidence that whenever someone raises an issue against you in public forums, you start receiving those so called "blackmail emails"? Or is it just a way to weaken the claims of the person speaking out?" Yet, he didn’t respond to that.
I'll reply to this as its relevant information, we've had legitimate threads against us, which were analyzed by the bitcointalk community, such as faulty deposit bonus T&C's, but we've also had a bunch of fake accusation, followed by blackmail attempts, such as your case!
But to share a bit of good news, and I'm kicking myself a bit for not thinking of this sooner, as we would have ended this spectacle 6 pages ago, while we can not link OPs account as its been deleted to bets made, due to him confirming with a screenshot, a bet he's placed on a server seed/client seed, we were able to scrape from our bet history archive the bets, chance %, bet amounts, and results played on that server seed/client seed. Basically instead of searching in our database for bets placed by user X and get no results due to GDPR consent removal, Should have simply filtered by bets placed on client seed X server seed Y, as that server seed/client seed combo was unique to OP.
So what we were able to dig out is quite simple, OP hasn't even played on the 15.5% chance, all bets he played ( manual and auto as he claimed he switched sides manually) were done on 33% chance.
While I'm currently not able to share here the bet archive file, due to company policy rules ( no show for internal company documents) I will be able to show it to any 3d authorized mediator. So please OP, you've stated in a recent email that you will contact AG, go ahead and do it so we can finally put this to rest.
Kirito89,
Duckdice Support.