Well, we don't know what will happen, maybe it could be like bestchange? 
I think it doesn't look that bad since they've prepared the signature and avatar, I agree there's a risk for participating in a campaign managed by unknown newbie, but it just risking for a week right? I guess users who applied in that thread don't mind for that, especially there are many posters aren't campaign right now.
I think it doesn't look that bad since they've prepared the signature and avatar, I agree there's a risk for participating in a campaign managed by unknown newbie, but it just risking for a week right? I guess users who applied in that thread don't mind for that, especially there are many posters aren't campaign right now.
The manager may be new but that does not mean he cannot manage the campaign, so we should not judge based on that. Secondly, the signature thread specified maximum of 15 posts to be paid $1.5/per post.
However, you are right that a lot of things are not clear about the signature campaign especially on the hire and fire weekly base on the discretion of the manager. I think they should find a reputable manager to handle the campaign for them. If there is risk, it will be working for one week without pay so only those not in campaign should take such risk.
It means a lot because what if the user is only here to scam people. You will register in the site and after a week people will start to complain that no money is paid. Later the people that are gambling on the site may say they have been unable to withdraw. Which can then turn to be scam. However, you are right that a lot of things are not clear about the signature campaign especially on the hire and fire weekly base on the discretion of the manager. I think they should find a reputable manager to handle the campaign for them. If there is risk, it will be working for one week without pay so only those not in campaign should take such risk.