Post
Topic
Board Meta
Re: Signature campaigns question. How fair is this?
by
Fivestar4everMVP
on 31/01/2025, 20:28:33 UTC
I was wondering what you think of this: When you see someone making a signature campaign thread, usually the manager or the person in charge, they require that you meet a certain criteria and so on, which is reasonable. However, isn't it not fair that they ask people to wear a signature campaign while they are thinking about thinking about getting the person accepted? They are basically asking for free advertisement.

If you ask a bunch of people to wear your signature while they are looking for the right applications, during this time, which sometimes takes up to a week, there's all this people hoping to get accepted, so that's this bunch of people "working for free".

Im not saying there should be a rule where this is forbidden, but this is clearly unreasonable. One should wear the signature when you are accepted, not before. Just my opinion.
I believe what you are talking about is bounty campaign which involves Altcoin payment in the Altcoin section of this forum, not signature campaigns with Bitcoin payment found in the service section of the forum.

When applying for a signature bounty in a bounty campaign, managers do ask the interested participants to wear the signature and avatar of the company before filling in their application, this is possibly because there are alot of cheaters in bounty campaigns where if the manager accept a participant while he or she is not yet wearing the required signature and avatar, they may end up not wearing  it.

This is not the same with signature campaign in the service board of this forum, managers there allow participants to apply without first wearing the signature, the participant is required to wear the signature and other materials immediately after he is she gets accepted into the campaign.