, it was a conversation on open subject with reasons why investors are getting diversified into something else. I never reasoned to the extent of trying to pull anyone interest into shitcoins, clearly i am not the shitcoiner you were hoping.
Yes. Diversification came up, and you framed your ideas about diversification in terms of getting into shitcoins since you said that
bitcoin might not give you enough returns. That comes off as a shitcoiner way of describing what is diversification and/or what the purpose of diversification might be. Sure it could be a potentially valid approach, even though it seems to lead us into shitcoins, and then the topic of shitcoins itself is a very slippery-slope kind of a topic that can lead into a lot of nonsense talk regarding which shitcoin might be less shitty than another shitcoin, and frequently it is better to completely avoid those kinds of topics with an intention of somewhat attempting to stay on topic.
If @Callido actually said and i quote that bitcoin might not give enough returns that means he is invariably trying to tell us to invest in some fucking shitcoins but what i see from the explanation he is trying to give, i feel he is a bit confused or don't know how to place words accurately in order to pass the rightful information he wish to give. That not withstanding, i am still thinking of the shitcoin that one can probably think of diversifying into that will yeild enough returns as @Callido said, lol. The summary of everything is just that he sounds contradictory, confused and can't use words accurately to butress a point. lol