We are but a few hours from the first monthly close above $100,000. So for those of you who were only doing this challenge until Bitcoin hits $100K, your final day was today as far as I’m concerned. Now we can focus solely on our next milestone.
You are retarded.
Perhaps he's suggesting to those UID's that have been identified by me [
1] [
2] (and then by the woke pitfork/flaming torch brigade some two weeks later) as being probable alts of each-other, that they should now move on.
I was referring to OgNasty's presumptuous (and/or rugpull) reference to the shitcoin pound as if it were a new goal for thread participants.
Personally, I am not too attached to any need to remove names from the pushup table, because I am a bit concerned about going too far down any slope of any requirement for pushup thread participants to prove their reported pushups, but at the same time if it is obvious that alts are submitting multiple pushup reports and seemingly screwing up the pushup table (and/or overly skewing it with information that seems obviously incorrect), then it could be worth considering removal of some names if it seems to be fairly obvious to several of the regular pushers that the table results are becoming overly skewed by such seeming fluff... and surely DirtyKeyboard could choose to identify some of this on his own, yet I doubt that DK has any obligation to attempt to sort these kinds of potentially unclear details out when in the whole scheme of things the potentially problematic report contents might ONLY be a relatively small percentage of the pushup table contents.