In the context of the current generally accepted norms, we do not see anything reprehensible and illegal in the actions of OpenChange, so the question of their exclusion has not yet been raised.
I've seen reputations on Bitcointalk destroyed for less.
For some reason, I think that this is the reason for all this hysteria.
It is not clear where so much trust in a newcomer comes from. And why so many attacks on a site that has existed for more than 15 years?
Has anyone heard the proverb "an old friend is better than two new ones?" Or is it no longer relevant today?
I will also add that I have been using this exchanger longer than I learned about bitcoin, that is, more than 10 years. No one has ever deceived me, although the exchange was not in bitcoin. Nevertheless, the trust is great.
Since Best_Change explains the same thing about the terms of the service, where there are rules and the freedom to NOT use this service multiple times, I see this conversation between the blind and the deaf. No one just wants to hear anything.