According to Logfiles, Don Pedro was asking for opinions on whether it's cool to leave neutral trust flags to users who seem to mislead the public, right? And being that he didn't use it on anyone was what made it obvious that it was just an opinion he was asking for and I think that since the Op felt it was a gross misuse of power and "suggested" that Pedro be removed from the DT, is it not an opinion he is also giving?
Or is there a proper period of time before one needs to start making such requests?
I understand that the words of a newbie when weighed against that of a reputable member of this place does not really hold much water but should it mean they too can't say it?
LOL. If we’re giving trust ratings for misleading people then I could call out half of the DT members for lies that they’ve said about me. Imagine spending 13 years of your life donating free electricity, cooling, and space in your home to mine on behalf of the community and give those coins away, then have people spreading lies that you’re running a ponzi or lying to people. There are many in DT and even in this thread who do that, while having never given a satoshi to this forum or any Bitcoin organization. When it comes to the default trust network, it’s laughably filled with bad actors trying to tear down others to make a name for themselves. That’s why a majority of the talent that comes here leaves. The people responsible for this lunacy need to take a hard look in the mirror. Do they want to be a big fish in a dry pond, or do they want to support Bitcoin projects and help grow Bitcoin’s community? Unfortunately, I know the answer already.