If you post trust feedback e.g. "this is a counter to x/y/z 's positive/neutral/negative" then you're the only one who will look foolish.
Similarly, if you DT trust/distrust others in hopes of manipulating the trust feedback left for others, then you are only showing yourself to be no better than those who you are trying to protect.
LoyceV USED TO point out the DT Trust/Distrust is your assertion that a person's Trust feedback is good/bad.
Sadly, there are a shall we say small group within the forum that use the DT as a weapon to "punish" or "silence" others.
Had you framed your question giving examples of incorrect trust feedback your thread *might* have had some substance to it. Instead, Your OP is a perfect example of trying to silence others through a group attack on another user. That is manipulating the DT system. Which is another thing that LoyceV USED TO remind others of.
Your own [Trust feedback] page is empty, so I can't judge as yet whether or not I can justify leaving you negative trust feedback.
As to the subject of your attack, let's have a look, shall we?
Don Pedro Dinero [BPIP] currently DT2 [link] with just one UID distrusting them { Kruw}
While both yourself and Kruw have been online for close to two years each (neither of you waking up) You're distrusted by Jollygood while Krew is DT distrusted by 20 UID's (half of whom are DT1 this month)
Essentially, Kruw's distrust of Don Pedro Dinero is meaningless so it makes me wonder why a *cough* newbie with just 45 posts in two years of constant activity would want to suddenly coax others to manipulate the DT system.
Lo and Behold! Neither you nore Kruw have actually posted in the above mentioned thread.
There about five (maybe six) users who are taking the stance that the 2%-5% is a reality, while the rest of the users are posting valid reasons why such a notion is sheer lunacy. None have a neutral let along a negative from anyone on the matter. At least a couple of them should have flags to warn others with that thread as a sign post.
As to Don Pedro Dinero's Trust Feedback
There less than 100 trust feedbacks - I can't get a screenshot of all of them in one image, but he's a sample:
I probably would have written the same had I encountered these users first.
But what's your interest in a thread? You've recently joined in discussions about others with meaningless glib. And a year after registering are still using rhetoric such as
to boost your post count. It took you 107 posts by others (across a two month period) to reply to the second post in the thread. The thread continues for another two months before peatering out, yet you never respond after that one instance.
Interestingly, one of those five (not Kruw) from that 2% thread posts as does Don Pedro Dinero.
It's pretty obvious Why2why isn't your only account.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;dt
Kruw's trust feedback to others: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=3534730;dt
Positives have no reference link while the negatives are ... just negative and subjective at best.
Similarly, if you DT trust/distrust others in hopes of manipulating the trust feedback left for others, then you are only showing yourself to be no better than those who you are trying to protect.
LoyceV USED TO point out the DT Trust/Distrust is your assertion that a person's Trust feedback is good/bad.
Sadly, there are a shall we say small group within the forum that use the DT as a weapon to "punish" or "silence" others.
Had you framed your question giving examples of incorrect trust feedback your thread *might* have had some substance to it. Instead, Your OP is a perfect example of trying to silence others through a group attack on another user. That is manipulating the DT system. Which is another thing that LoyceV USED TO remind others of.
Your own [Trust feedback] page is empty, so I can't judge as yet whether or not I can justify leaving you negative trust feedback.
As to the subject of your attack, let's have a look, shall we?
Don Pedro Dinero [BPIP] currently DT2 [link] with just one UID distrusting them { Kruw}
While both yourself and Kruw have been online for close to two years each (neither of you waking up) You're distrusted by Jollygood while Krew is DT distrusted by 20 UID's (half of whom are DT1 this month)
Essentially, Kruw's distrust of Don Pedro Dinero is meaningless so it makes me wonder why a *cough* newbie with just 45 posts in two years of constant activity would want to suddenly coax others to manipulate the DT system.
Lo and Behold! Neither you nore Kruw have actually posted in the above mentioned thread.
There about five (maybe six) users who are taking the stance that the 2%-5% is a reality, while the rest of the users are posting valid reasons why such a notion is sheer lunacy. None have a neutral let along a negative from anyone on the matter. At least a couple of them should have flags to warn others with that thread as a sign post.
As to Don Pedro Dinero's Trust Feedback
There less than 100 trust feedbacks - I can't get a screenshot of all of them in one image, but he's a sample:
I probably would have written the same had I encountered these users first.
But what's your interest in a thread? You've recently joined in discussions about others with meaningless glib. And a year after registering are still using rhetoric such as
As a newbie and first-time investor and holder of Bitcoin,
to boost your post count. It took you 107 posts by others (across a two month period) to reply to the second post in the thread. The thread continues for another two months before peatering out, yet you never respond after that one instance.
Interestingly, one of those five (not Kruw) from that 2% thread posts as does Don Pedro Dinero.
It's pretty obvious Why2why isn't your only account.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;dt
Code:
Don Pedro Dinero
~Kruw
~Kruw
Kruw's trust feedback to others: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=3534730;dt
Positives have no reference link while the negatives are ... just negative and subjective at best.