PROVEN STATISTICAL EVIDENCE - Player 1 (@BlackyJacky):- Total Bets: 180,904
- Wins: 78,285
- Losses: 86,612
- Net Losses: 8,327 bets (86,612 - 78,285)
- Actual Loss Rate: 4.6% (8,327/180,904)
- Expected Loss Rate: 0.5%
- Deviation Beyond Maximum: 7,427 bets
- Additional deviation: 9.3x beyond maximum possible
Player 2 (KingBJ) - Multi-Game Analysis:- Total Bets: 119,156
- Total Wagered: $1,478,400.92
- Expected Loss (0.5%): $7,392
- Actual Loss: $60,000
- Win Rate: 41.46% (49,401 wins)
- Loss Rate: 55.58% (66,227 losses)
- Statistical Deviation: 24.66σ
- Deviation from Expected: 14.12%
I came across your game statistics and had a few questions. I'm not sure if these have already been addressed.
You use 0.5% as the expected loss, but a 0.5% house edge only applies when playing perfect basic strategy under optimal conditions—such as the dealer standing on soft 17, double after split allowed, a 3:2 Blackjack payout, and surrender permitted, among other factors.
Did you play perfect basic strategy, and are these optimal conditions present in Stake Originals Blackjack?I also noticed that your statistics don’t include the number of pushes and Blackjacks. Since Blackjack pays 3:2, this is a crucial factor that seems to be missing.
Additionally, did you use consistent bet sizes over 100k hands? If bet sizes varied, then the total wagered and expected loss become less relevant, as you could have won small bets and lost larger ones, skewing the results.
That being said, the probability of a normal win is around 42%, which is quite close to your numbers.