Yeah, I read their response about this case, and it's good thing that Razed had paid their customer and will change their sport provider. And so it was a happy ending and their reputation here stays, so everything is good not for the user.
Like i already said, it was a god ending, the customer got paid and it is case closed from his end. That being said, i don't fully understand how the provider is at fault, is it the provider that checks KYC? Because this customers KYC was checked and the casino returned with the accusation that they were all forged. This customer was also accused of being part of a betting syndicate, was the accusation made by the sports provider?