At this point, I think it is safe to assume you're grasping at straws, to build a strawman, in order to make it do a witch hunt and throw muds in hope it sticks.

The explanation to your whole posts is simple, someone who can figure out a way to get to a very old thread in two minutes should have been able to figure the difference between your case and the other one.

Your case, got your whole data deleted as it's been a year, there were time elapsed since the "right to be forgotten" being enacted to the time you requested your betting history. That user, had recently asked his right to be forgotten and the process is still ongoing.

If we have to use the "burning book" analogy, the fire just lit and started to eat several pages, hence some pages are still readable. Yours, is an ash. That probably already blown by the wind. Nothing left.

How is this hard to understand? I honestly can't see it's hard, as the explanation of the gradual process itself is already explained on that thread. Unless you deliberately choose to ignore the explanation and refuse to understand.

About proof of you requesting Art. 17 of GDPR, again, it's been explained. The whole paradox and all. In the current state that I am now [I've brushed it on my previous post], I have no mood to re-explain, nor that I think it's necessary, as the explanation has been made in abundance. All you need is to open your mind when you read.

And AG. No time? You could write and overuse the font-editing feature of the forum and repeat same points over and over again, but you don't have time to write to AG? I'll suggest you to perhaps write them instead of repeating things here. It might bring us somewhere.