All you get from shitcoins is already available, or in the making, on Bitcoin (Lightning, Taproot etc ).. there will be no need for more base ledgers than one in the coming future..
Most noobs don't understand that... I have seen many learn it the hard way by loosing money.
I hate that I’m forced to take the anti-Bitcoin position on this thread at times, but the Lightning network is absolute garbage that nobody wants to use. Especially not people who are new to crypto. Maybe that will change in the future but I’ve been more active than most people in this hobby of ours and I have yet to ever encounter a situation when I needed to use the Lightning network, whereas I’ve come across many situations where my only option was to use ETH, SOL, or POL. I don’t acquire these coins to speculate. I have been forced to acquire these coins in order to complete a task because no other options were available to complete said task. That being said, Bitcoin is still my number 1 choice for everything and if it is ever possible to use it, I do.
That's totally understandable. There are functions that other coins still perform better than Bitcoin.
And I also see lightning being still in its infancy, and that it might well be replaced by some other second layer in the future.
My issue was with your original post when you implied that Lolana might be setting up get to the same level as Bitcoin by taking over the peer to peer payments side of things, while Bitcoins acts as the store of value.
There might be a small chance for Lolana to do that - indefinitely small chance though, when I check every shitcoin's performance within the last 10+ years.
You made it sound a bit too likely imo. Many noobs reading your post might take that kind of probability seriously and give the Lolana devs their money instead of putting it into something that has indeed a
very high probability to take over a substantial part of the worldwide economic value..